Previous Page  6 / 12 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 12 Next Page
Page Background

The patient was an elderly woman

who was residing in a care home.

She had diabetes and a poor

nutritional status and had smoked

in the past.

The ulcer on her lower leg had

been present for six weeks with

dressings being changed every two

days because of excessive exudate.

She had been given systemic

antibiotics before the evaluation,

but did not take any during this

two-week trial of Actilite Protect.

At presentation, the wound bed

exhibited 100% granulation tissue

and the wound itself measured

4x3cm. There were signs of critical

colonisation and the periwound

area was red. The patient rated her

wound pain as ‘6’ on a 10-point scale

where ‘10’ indicated the worst pain.

Wound progress

Actilite Protect (10x10cm) was used

in conjunction with Sorbaderm

®

No-sting Barrier Film (Aspen

Medical) with the dressing being

changed every three days. After

one week, the wound had reduced

in size to 4x2cm with an island

of epithelialisation, however

there were still signs of critical

colonisation and the patient’s pain

levels remained high.

By the end of week two, the

wound had reduced in size to

2x2cm. The critical colonisation

had resolved and the pain had

reduced to a rating of ‘2’, with the

dressing now being changed every

four days. The clinician noted that

the dressing was atraumatic to the

wound bed and almost atraumatic

to the periwound skin, although

the clinician did mention that the

adhesive remover may have helped

with this. The dressing conformed

well to the wound and there was no

pain on application, although there

was some on removal. The dressing

stayed intact as well as remaining in

place as long as expected, with no

rolling at the edges.

At the end of the two-week

evaluation the clinician concluded

that Actilite Protect had tackled the

infection effectively and helped the

wound to heal (

Figures 1–3

show the

wound’s improvement). The dressing

made a great difference to the

appearance of the wound bed, with

healing noted and exudate and pain

levels both reduced. The three-in-

one structure of the dressing (foam,

Manuka honey and a silicone wound

contact layer) was appreciated by the

clinician and it was considered cost-

effective and easy to apply. Overall,

the clinician reported that Actilite

Protect was very easy to use and easy

to remove.

The patient found the dressing

very comfortable and was very

satisfied with the treatment,

particularly the reduced pain levels.

CASE REPORT 3

This case shows how a honey-

based foam dressing tackled

the infection present in a

patient’s leg ulcer, as well as

helping the wound heal and

reducing exudate volumes.

Figure 1.

Wound at the outset of the evaluation.

Figure 2.

Wound reducing in size.

Figure 3.

Towards the end of the evaluation the

wound exhibited reduced exudate volumes.

6

JCN supplement

2015,Vol 29, No 4