Previous Page  10 / 12 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 10 / 12 Next Page
Page Background

CASE REPORT 7

This report looks at the case

of a patient with an infected

non-healing pressure ulcer,

detailing how a honey-based

dressing reduced the size

of the wound and resolved

the infection.

At presentation, the wound

consisted of 100% granulating tissue

and measured 1x1.5cm — it was

described by the clinician as critically

colonised. The periwound skin was

red but the wound itself was not

causing the patient any pain. After

one week of treatment the tissue was

still 100% granulating, but the wound

size had reduced to 1x1cm (

Figure 1

).

After following the new dressing

regimen for two weeks, the clinician

rated Actilite Protect as very easy

to use, apply and remove (rating

all three categories as ‘1’ on a five-

point scale where ‘1’was ‘very easy’

and ‘5’was ‘very difficult’). The

dressing was rated as atraumatic to

the wound bed and the periwound

skin. At the end of the trial, the

dressing was being changed every

five days rather than every two days,

and after two weeks of treatment

the wound had completely healed

(

Figure 2

). The clinician stated

that the infection that had been

preventing the wound from healing

had been resolved through the

action of the dressing’s Manuka

honey dissolvable film.

The clinician stated that dressing

changes were pain-free and that

there was no need for local analgesia.

The dressing remained intact upon

removal and stayed in place during

wear and its conformability was

considered to be very good. The

edges of the dressing had rolled-up,

however and the clinician stated that

the use of oval-shaped dressings on

that particular part of the foot could

be used to prevent this.

When asked about the new

dressing, the patient reported that

it had been very comfortable and

that she was very satisfied with

the treatment (rating it ‘1’ on a

scale where ‘1’ was ‘very satisfied’

and ‘5’ was ‘dissatisfied’). She also

reported that the treatment had

been pain-free.

Whereas the previous two-

dressing regimen had failed, the

clinician stated that Actilite Protect

positively contributed to the wound’s

eventual healing.

Figure 1.

Wound after one week of treatment with

Actilite Protect.

Figure 2.

Healed wound after two weeks

of treatment.

This patient was an 82-year-old

woman who was being cared for

in a nursing home and who had

developed a pressure ulcer on the

side of her left foot that had been

present for six months. She was a

non-smoker, but her nutritional

status was described as poor and,

although she did not have diabetes,

this was being checked three-

monthly because of the wound’s

very slow healing rate.

At the time of presentation,

the ulcer was being dressed with

Sorbsan

®

(Aspen Medical) every

two days, with a foam dressing as a

secondary dressing and a protective

barrier applied to the periwound skin.

Wound progress

It was decided to use Actilite Protect

on the patient’s wound because of the

potential benefits — Manuka honey

for antimicrobial debridement; a

foam layer for exudate management;

and a silicone outer layer to protect

the fragile periwound skin and assist

with atraumatic removal.

Sorbaderm

®

No-sting Barrier

Film (Aspen Medical) was used

along with Actilite Protect

(10x10cm), although the clinician

commented that she would have

used a 5x5cm dressing had this size

been available.

10

JCN supplement

2015,Vol 29, No 4