Previous Page  3 / 12 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 3 / 12 Next Page
Page Background

The evaluations detailed in this case report series were undertaken by:

Sarah Mancini, clinical director, Clinical UK Ltd (

cases 1–2

)

Jackie Stephen-Haynes, professor and consultant nurse in tissue viability, Birmingham City University

and Worcestershire Health and Care Trust (

cases 3–8

)

Rosie Callaghan, tissue viability nurse specialist, Worcestershire Health and Care Trust (

cases 3–8

)

disrupting established biofilm (Cooper et al, 2014). There is also a suggestion that using honey is less likely to result in

the development of resistant strains of bacteria: a widespread problem that has happened as a result of the over-use of

antibiotics (European Wound Management Association [EWMA], 2014).

Promotes debridement in sloughy and necrotic wounds and creates a moist wound environment

Honey promotes autolytic debridement by providing a moist wound environment and through the possible activation of

proteases (Molan, 2009). The high sugar content and low water levels in honey produce an optimal moist environment

for wound healing by exerting an osmotic effect that can draw excess moisture away from the wound (Molan, 2009).

Reduces or eliminates wound malodour

Wound dressings that contain honey are particularly suited to malodorous wounds that have local infection (White

2005b). Honey stops the production of ammonia and other odorous products of bacterial decomposition in necrotic

wounds (White and Molan, 2005). It also debrides devitalised tissue and reduces bioburden and any accompanying

smell (Bradbury et al, 2014).

Stimulation of healing

Honey promotes the production of cells that promote healing and the growth of new tissue.

CASE REPORTS

Advancis Medical was the first company in the UK to introduce medical grade Manuka honey into wound care dressings

and it has since developed a wealth of expertise and knowledge in producing innovative honey-based products. This

case report series explores the use of Actilite Protect over a predetermined time period in a range of wounds. The

evaluations provide an overview of Actilite Protect’s action on non-healing wounds. Both the outcomes and clinician/

patient feedback show that this dressing is a worthy addition to the healthcare professional’s wound care toolkit, from a

clinical, quality of life and health economic perspective.

REFERENCES

Bainbridge PJ (2013) Wound healing and the role of fibroblasts.

Wound Care

22(8):

407–12

Bradbury S, Callaghan R, Ivins N (2014) ManukaDress Made Easy. Wounds UK 10(1): 1–6

Chandan K, Gayle M, Gordillo MD, et al (2009) Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy.

Wound Rep Regen

17(6):

763–71

Cooper R, Jenkins L, Hooper S (2014) Inhibition of biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by Medihoney in vitro.

J Wound Care

23(3): 93–104

Dunford C (2000) Using honey as a dressing for infected skin lesions.

Nurs Times

96(14 Suppl): 7–9

Evans J, Mahoney K (2013) Efficacy of medical-grade honey as an autolytic debridement agent.

Wounds UK

9(1):

30–36A

EuropeanWound Management Association (2014) EWMA Document: Antimicrobials and Non-healingWounds: Evidence, controversies and suggestions.

J

Wound Care

22 (Supp5): S1–S89

Gethin G, Cowman S (2008) Bacteriological changes in sloughy venous leg ulcers treated with manuka honey or hydrogel: an RCT.

J Wound Care

17(6):

241–7

Molan PC (2009) Debridement of wounds with honey.

J Wound Technol

5:12–17

Wahdan HA (1998) Causes of the antimicrobial activity of honey.

Infection

26:26–31.

White R (2005a) Honey in modern wound management.

Independent Nurse

doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/indn.2005.1.10.74043

White R (2005b) Using honey in clinical practice.

Independent Nurse

doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/indn.2005.1.10.74042

White R, Molan P (2005) A summary of published clinical research on honey in wound management. In: WhiteR, CooperR, MolanP, Eds.

Honey: A modern

wound management product.

Wounds UK, Aberdeen: 130–42

JCN supplement

2015,Vol 29, No 4

3