REFERENCES
All Wales Tissue Viability Nurse Forum and All Wales
Continence Forum (2012)
Prevention and Management
of Moisture Lesions
. Available online: www.
welshwoundnetwork.org (accessed 26 January, 2017)
Beeckman D, Schoonhoven L, Fletcher J, et al (2010) Pressure
ulcers and incontinence-associated dermatitis: effectiveness
of the Pressure Ulcer Classification education tool on
classification by nurses.
Qual Saf Health Care
19(5):
3
Black JM, Gray M, Bliss DZ, et al (2011) MASD part 2:
incontinence associated dermatitis and intertriginous
dermatitis: a consensus.
J Wound Ost Continence Nurs
38(4):
359–70
Colwell JC, Ratliff CR, Goldburg M, et al (2011) MASD part 3:
peristomal moisture-associated dermatitis and periwound
moisture-associated dermatitis: a consensus.
J Wound
Ostomy Continence Nurs
38(5):
233–41
Cooper P, Clark M, Bale S (2006)
Best Practice Statement: care of
the older person’s skin
. Wounds UK, London
Cutting KF (1999) The causes and prevention of maceration of
the skin.
J Wound Care
8(4):
200–01
Fletcher J (2008) Understanding the differences between
moisture lesions and pressure ulcers.
Nurs Times
104(50):
38–9
Gray M, Bliss D, Doughty D, Ermer-Seltum J, Kennedy-Evans
K, Palmer M (2007) Incontinence-associated dermatitis: a
consensus.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs
34:
45–54
Gray M, Black JM, Baharestani MM, et al (2011) Moisture-
associated skin damage: overview and pathophysiology.
J
Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs
38(3):
233–41
Hahler B (2006) An overview of dermatological conditions
commonly associated with the obese patient.
Ostomy
Wound Manage
52(6):
34–40
Kottner J, Halfens R (2010) Moisture lesions: interrater
agreement and reliability.
J Clin Nurs
19:
716–20
Lichterfeld A, Hauss A, Surber C, Peters T, Blume-Peytavi U,
Kottner J (2015) Evidence-based skin care. A systematic
literature review and the development of a basic skin care
algorithm.
J Wound Ostomy and Continence Nurs
42(5):
1–24
Smith IL, Nixon J, brown S, Wilson L, Coleman S (2016)
Pressure ulcer and wounds reporting in NHS hospitals
in England part 1: audit of monitoring systems.
J Tissue
Viability
25(1):
3–15
Voegeli D (2010) Care or harm: exploring essential
components in skin care regimens.
Br J Nurs
19(13):
810–14
Voegeli D (2012) Moisture-associated skin damage: aetiology,
prevention and treatment.
Br J Nurs
21(9):
517–21
Yates S (2012) Differentiating between pressure ulcers and
moisture lesions
Wound Essentials
2:
16–22
Young T (2012) The causes and clinical presentation of
moisture lesions In: Ousey K (ed).
Moisture Lesions
Supplement
.
Wounds UK
12(8):
S1–20
SKIN CARE TODAY
2017,Vol 3, No 1
11
Huntleigh Healthcare, Diagnostic Products Division,
35 Portmanmoor Road, Cardiff CF24 5HN
AUTOMATIC, EASY AND FAST
Now with the
Dopplex Ability
ABPI system,
Ankle Brachial Pressure Index has never been
simpler or quicker.
•
Simple to use, only one operator with minimal
training required
•
No need to rest the patient (clinically proven)
•
No need to locate the vessels
•
Automatically detects systolic pressures and
calculates ABPI’s
•
Measures all 4 limbs – complies with all
National/International guidelines
•
Total test time <5 minutes
•
Integral printer for instant results with time
and date
•
Automatic classification
For more information contact: 029 2048 5885 or visit:
www.huntleigh-diagnostics.com