Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  5 / 16 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 5 / 16 Next Page
Page Background

DEBRIDEMENT

knowledge of other debridement

options, rather than because it is

in the best interests of the patient

(Gray et al, 2011; Fumarola, 2012).

In the current climate where

evidence-based practice and

cost- and clinical-effectiveness

are expected, it is important that

clinicians question whether their

chosen method of debridement will

result in the removal of non-viable

tissue in the most efficient and

timely manner, or if their practice is

ritualistic and limited to their past

experience, skill-set and availability

(Young, 2011; 2012).

Of course, autolytic

debridement might suit some

clients’ needs following an open

discussion and exploration of

potential methods, but practitioners

should revisit their skill-set and

knowledge to ensure that they

are able to offer patients the most

appropriate debridement method

for their individual needs (Young,

2012; Wounds UK, 2013).

NICE guidelines

on Debrisoft

®

The National Institute for Health

and Care Excellence (NICE, 2014)

has recently recommended the use

of Debrisoft

®

 (Activa Healthcare), a

monofilament debridement pad, in

the community for the management

of acute and chronic wounds in

adults and children. When compared

with existing alternatives for wound

debridement, such as autolytic

debridement using dressings, or

wound irrigation with saline or

cleansing with gauze, NICE found

that Debrisoft offers patient benefits

and savings to the NHS.

Using Debrisoft, debridement

can take an average of 2–4 minutes,

with a range of 2–12 minutes

(Strohal et al, 2013), compared

with the days or even weeks taken

using dressings to promote autolytic

debridement. This makes it a

time-efficient method of debriding

many wounds encountered in

the community nurse’s daily

caseload, including leg ulcers and

the build up of dead skin cells,

or hyperkeratosis that frequently

fewer nurse visits needed compared

with other debridement methods.

In addition, the Debrisoft pad is

convenient and easy to use, and is

well tolerated by patients’.

Cost-savings to the NHS

Debrisoft has been shown to

reduce specialist nurse, general

nurse and equipment costs by

assisting in accurate categorisation

of pressure ulcers (Swan and Orig,

2013), and reduce costs and time

when compared to larval therapy

(Hawkins, 2012). It has also been

found to potentially prevent hospital

admission and shorten inpatient

stays related to wounds (Callaghan

and Stephen-Haynes, 2012;

Hawkins, 2012; Wilson, 2012; Girip

and McLoughlin, 2013) and break

the cycle of chronic ulceration by

‘When compared with

existing alternatives for

wound debridement... NICE

found that Debrisoft offers

patient benefits and savings

to the NHS’

surrounds venous leg ulceration. No

specialist training is required, giving

any clinician the ability to perform

quick and easy skin cleansing and

wound debridement. The use of

Debrisoft causes the patient little or

no pain (Bahr et al, 2011; Flinton,

2011; Haemmerle et al, 2011;

Denyer, 2013). It can also be used

by patients (Whitaker, 2012) and

healthcare assistants (Whiteside

and McIntyre, 2013) to utilise

resources more effectively, and to

promote patient self-care (Stephen-

Haynes and Callaghan, 2012).

The NICE evaluation considered

evidence from clinical experts on

the clinical- and cost-efficacy of

Debrisoft, and from 15 multiple-

patient case-series reports

(five peer-reviewed papers and

10 posters), it found that Debrisoft:

Is more effective at debridement

than the common practice of

using hydrogel or other autolytic

dressings and irrigating wounds

with saline or gentle cleansing

with gauze

Gives quicker debridement,

allowing earlier visibility of the

wound bed and therefore better

management of the wound

May reduce pain associated

with debridement

Enables faster treatment (on

average, two to four minutes per

wound) resulting in less frequent

and fewer overall care visits

Reduces risk of trauma to

healthy tissue and reduces

bleeding

Reduces overall number of

wound dressings used

Contributes to overall cost-

savings compared with

current practices.

The conclusion of the NICE

guidance committee was that by

using Debrisoft on appropriate

wounds, these wounds would be

‘fully debrided more quickly, with

JCN supplement

2014,Vol 28, No 6

5

DEBRISOFT... FACTS

Debrisoft

®

is a monofilament

fibre debridement pad designed

to mechanically remove slough

and devitalised tissue from

the wound bed and

surrounding skin.

It is a single-use, soft,

polyester fibre pad that is

moistened with tap water,

sterile water or saline and

gently wiped across the

wound or skin, where more

than 18 million flexible

monofilament fibres remove

and retain exudate (Wiegand

et al, 2013), dead cells and

wound debris.

Debrisoft can be used to

prepare the wound bed for

assessment, for healing and to

improve the condition of the

periwound skin (Callaghan

and Stephen-Haynes, 2012;

Dowsett et al, 2013).

Debrisoft is safe to use for the

removal of devitalised tissue

from the wound bed and its

gentle action leaves healthy

granulation tissue intact,

including small islands of

epithelial tissue (Haemmerle et

al, 2011).