Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  4 / 16 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 4 / 16 Next Page
Page Background

DEBRIDEMENT

W

ound bed preparation and

care of the periwound

skin are essential

components of venous leg ulcer

management, with debridement

being integral to achieving effective

wound management (Strohal

et al, 2013; Wounds UK, 2013).

The community nurse plays an

important role in delivering wound

care, from wound assessment

and debridement of non-viable

tissue, to referral to other clinicians

if indicated. Traditionally, the

choices of debridement available

to practitioners working in the

community setting have been

limited. Clinicians have generally

relied on speeding up the natural

process of autolytic debridement

through the use of wound

dressings. However, this technique

involves patients having extended

periods with non-viable tissue

in their wound, which ultimately

delays healing and puts them at

increased risk of developing a

wound infection (Young, 2012).

‘Autolytic debridement is often

selected by clinicians due

to their familiarity with the

technique, or because they

do not have the knowledge

of other debridement options,

rather than because it is in the

best interests of the patient’

Simon Barrett,Tissue Viability Lead Specialist,

Humber NHS Foundation Trust

In the current healthcare climate,

clinicians are expected to deliver

evidence-based practice, that is

practice supported by evidence

of its cost- and clinical-efficacy.

This article highlights the need

for practitioners to be aware of

advances in debridement (Strohal et

al, 2013), and to carry out evidence-

based practice that optimises

outcomes for patients, clinicians

and trusts alike, rather than relying

on routine or ritualistic practice.

Debridement in

the community

Debridement is the removal of non-

viable tissue from the wound bed to

encourage wound healing and, as

said, is an essential part of wound

care (Strohal et al, 2013). Devitalised

tissue acts as a focus for infection,

providing a breeding ground for

bacteria and a physical barrier to

healing. Its presence prolongs the

Are you debriding based on

today’s evidence?

inflammatory response, delaying

wound healing. Devitalised tissue

also conceals the wound bed and

makes accurate wound assessment

difficult (Stephen-Haynes and

Callaghan, 2012).

It is also widely accepted that

periwound skin cleansing, which

includes the removal of skin debris,

is an essential component of good

wound care (Vowden and Vowden,

2011).

Devitalised tissue may present as

yellow, grey, purple, black, or brown

tissue. It may be dry necrosis, wet

necrosis, wet slough, superficial wet

slough, dry slough, haematoma, or

hyperkeratosis of periwound skin

(Gray et al, 2011).

Autolytic, mechanical and larval

debridement methods are used in

the community setting as they do

not require additional skills, are

available on prescription, and can

be used safely (Wounds UK, 2013).

Of these, autolytic debridement has

traditionally been used, rather than

mechanical and larval techniques.

This has resulted in debridement

becoming ritualistic in some

cases, with the nurse choosing

this debridement method due to

familiarity with the technique,

or because they do not have the

Simon Barrett

4 JCN supplement

2014,Vol 28, No 6

IN BRIEF

Wound debridement is essential for accurate wound assessment,

wound bed preparation and care of the periwound skin in patients

with venous leg ulceration.

Traditional debridement methods can be time-consuming and

costly, with practice based on routine and familiarity rather

than evidence.

NICE recommend that Debrisoft

®

results in quicker debridement

with fewer nurse visits compared with other available options.

KEY WORDS:

Wound debridement

Venous leg ulcers

Debrisoft

®

NICE guidelines

Cost-effectiveness