Journal of General Practice Nursing (GPN) | July 2015

Back to journal

Cost efficacy of using Juxta CURESTM and UCSTM debridement cloths

Cost efficacy of using Juxta CURESTM and UCSTM debridement cloths
Long-term conditions

Article topics: Adjustable compression system, Cost savings, Patient concordance, Venous leg ulcers

Venous leg ulcers make up a large part of a nurse’s caseload, with the application of compression bandaging requiring competent and skilled practitioners. At Central and North West London Foundation Trust (CNWL) Camden Integrated Primary Care (IPC) Service recruiting and retaining community nurses is a challenge, a situation which is shared across all London boroughs. In particular, it is difficult to maintain consistent standards for wound cleansing and compression bandaging, resulting in the responsibility for a large caseload falling to a small number of practitioners. Following a review of innovative products on show at the European Wound Management Association (EWMA) conference in May 2014, an alternative to traditional compression bandaging was identified as a possible solution to this problem; namely, UCSTM for effective debridement and Juxta CURESTM as an alternative to compression bandaging (both medi UK Ltd, Hereford).

If you would like to write for the Journal of General Practice Nursing, please contact Binkie:
binkie@jcn.co.uk